Showing posts with label Mohnish Pabrai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohnish Pabrai. Show all posts

Thursday, October 3, 2013

How Mohnish Pabrai uses Checklist Investing

Forbes recently published an article "How Mohnish Pabrai Crushed The Market By 1100% Since 2000"
which provides glimpse on how Mohnish Pabrai uses a checklist in his investment decisions.

Mohnish Pabrai’s long-only equity fund has returned a cumulative 517% net to investors vs. 43% for the S&P 500 Index since inception in 2000.  That’s outperformance of 474 percentage points or 1103 percent. 
Mohnish Pabrai
Pabrai is a classic value investor in the tradition of Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Seth Klarman and Joel Greenblat. I recently had an opportunity to hear him talk and thought I’d pass along some of my bright yellow highlighting.
How to start investing
For Pabrai, this yellow brick road begins with Warren Buffett’s annual letters to shareholders (totaling 730 pages, now conveniently available for your  Amazon Kindle for $2.99 cheap).  From there he recommends the Buffett biographies (mentioning the ones by Lowenstein  and Schroeder).  I might add, though he didn’t, that you could do worse than to read Pabrai’s own book, The Dhando Investor.
Like Buffett, Pabrai looks at a stock not as a piece of paper but as the ownership of a business.  He has no interest in a company that looks ten percent undervalued.  He is angling to make five times his money in a few years.  If he doesn’t think the opportunity is blindingly obvious, he passes.  This requires him to apply his X-Ray vision to the fundamentals, and weigh the downside risk (the margin of safety) vs. the upside potential (the moat) at a given price.  His mantra: Heads I win, tails I don’t lose much.
Next, Pabrai practices patience.  He takes Charlie Munger’s admonition to heart that money is made not in the buying or selling but in the waiting.  As far as I am aware, he has not made a single new investment in 2013.  He says that if he can find a couple of investment ideas a year, that’s plenty.  His current preference is to keep a cash store of between 10%-20%.  This seems like a tremendous drag for a fund posting numbers like his, but he is really biding his time for a distressed situation to come along when he can deploy this trove at the valuation he wants.  During the next crisis, when everyone is jamming the exits, he will go all in.
Once you start purchasing stocks, Pabrai says the next  step is to closely examine every trade that doesn’t work, and figure out what went wrong.  Let me pause right here, because this is key to his whole method.
There is nothing more tempting that to sweep mistakes under the rug.  Denial is one of our top defense mechanisms.  If you are lucky, these trades come to haunt your sleep like Marley’s ghost.  If you are unlucky, you repress them forever.
Due to his background in engineering, Pabrai does not gloss over mistakes.  Investing is a field where you can have a high error rate (buying something you shouldn’t have, selling something you shouldn’t have, not buying something you should have, not selling something you should have) and still be successful.  He takes as a given that mistakes are inevitable.  The point is to learn from them so they are not repeated.  A major portion of his annual meeting is devoted to publicly analyzing investments where he lost money for his partners.  Lately these errors are becoming harder to find, so he has been reduced to talking about investments that didn’t fare as well as expected.
The checklist
Pabrai was impressed by Atul Gawande’s Checklist Manifesto, which recounts how a technology seemingly as trivial as a checklist led to life-saving results in the airline cockpit and the operating room. He wondered whether it could work the same magic for investors.
He began by looking at the public record of the investors he admired and deconstructing the mistakes they made — cases where there were klaxons sounding even the great ones missed.  He cites the example of Berkshire Hathaway’s purchase of Dexter Shoes — a New England factory with a great product used by everyone with feet. It immediately got hacked to pieces by cheap foreign labor.  Hence, one checklist item: is this a business that can be negatively impacted by low-cost competition from abroad?
After this analysis, he came up with one hundred or so check boxes.  He keeps it proprietary, but claims that if we were to see it, we would think it was jejuneand throw it away.   I wonder.  In any event, the items are grouped into categories.   A lot of them have to do with leverage, for obvious reasons.  A second group relates to the durability of the business’s “moat” — how difficult it is for new entrants or competitors to duplicate their product or service.  A third set of questions examine the quality of the company’s management.  Is the company being intelligently run for the benefit of shareholders?  There is also a fourth set of miscellaneous items, such as unions and labor relations, or is the company operating with a tailwind that may be only temporary?
Yale economist Robert Shiller has noted that many of the biggest advances in financial risk control seem ridiculously modest today: the widespread availability  in the 19th century of cheap paper made from wood pulp instead of cloth, the typewriter, carbon paper, the standardized form, the filing cabinet — all these made substantial improvements in the reliability of business operations.
Pabrai can can tick most of the boxes in twenty minutes, but then it gets interesting, because he realizes there are some areas — often not top-of-mind — that need more research and clarification.  This is the biggest payback, because it forces a 360 degree look at risk.  The human animal gets into tunnel thinking once it likes an investment idea, and this usefully stops that momentum.  Since 2008, Pabrai also has started talking over his investment ideas with a peer prior to jumping in.
The checklist is doubly important for a concentrated fund like his, which might only contain ten tickers.  Since he is angling for big total returns, these are usually companies in some distress to begin with — either from their own misdeeds or due to macro factors.  So far, it has radically trimmed the downside tails, although it has yet to be tested in a crash landing.
Cloning 
For Pabrai, investing is not an originality contest.  He shamelessly appropriates the ideas of others.  For example, he lifted the structure of his fund directly from the Buffett partnerships of the 1950s.  His primary source of investment ideas?  The 13F SEC filings from other value managers he admires: Berkshire, Longleaf, Baupost, Greenlight, Pershing Square, Third Avenue, etc.  He cites the University of Nevada study by Martin and Puthenpackal showing how merely investing alongside Warren Buffett (after information about Berkshire’s buys and sells became public) managed to beat the market by 11% a year over a 31-year period.
It looks like Pabrai holds the world in a paper cup.  To make matters worse, he’s also charitable, and his Dakshana Foundation is one of the best charities on the planet.  While he makes it sound easy, remember that he has nerves of steel and when he does invest, he goes in with unshakable conviction.  He’s willing to reach out and grab a stock falling like a dagger and then to keep buying while it plummets into the abyss.  I remember seeing him in September 2008 when his fund was down 60% and the global financial system was coming off the rails.  These facts bounced off him like a pea-shooter.  His only concern was finding cash to buy stocks while they were still cheap.
Read also:
Classic Pabrai - A 2011 Half Hour Interview With Monish Pabrai and Steve Forbes
Stocks that Pabrai bought

Monday, June 10, 2013

Classic Pabrai - A 2011 Half Hour Interview With Monish Pabrai and Steve Forbes

Monish Pabrai has an excellent long term track record as a hedge fund manager and luckily for us he is willing to share his approach to investing.

Monish thinks that 98% of the investment opportunities that come across his desk belong in the "too hard" pile. He does not like investing in technology companies because he thinks the industry changes too fast and the future cash flows of companies are just too hard to predict.

In the video below Mohnish Pabrai shares with us what we should look for in an investment and his investment checklist:



Friday, April 26, 2013

Top 7 Stocks Owned by Value Investors Every Investor Should Know



Mohnish Pabrai, one of my favourite investors, delivered a lecture on value investing at the UC Davis Graduate School of Management in 2012 where he explained his philosophy of how we can all become great investors. He introduced the idea of cloning and said that an investor would dramatically improve their results if they simply copied what Buffett and other value investor does.

What is cloning?

Based on Mohnish, cloning is a powerful concept and the best strategy.  It involves reverse engineering trades which meant applying the knowledge and expertise gained by the notable investors (the likes of warren Buffet, Charlie Munger) in our investing methodologies.

So does cloning really work? Mohnish Pabrai explained that a study by Gerald Martin and John Puthenpurackal (“Imitation is the Sincerest Form of Flattery”) had proved that if investors had just bought the stocks that Warren Buffett had bought, months after the official announcement, and at significantly higher prices than what Warren Buffett paid for them, they would have made a lot of money. Investors where Mohnish Pabrai would closely follow include Seth Klarman, fund manager of Baupost, Longleaf Partners, Greenlight Capital, Pershing Square, Third Avenue and Fairfax Holdings.
The best way to practice cloning is to keep an eye on what the big investors are buying.  This article will further extend the idea of cloning and look at the top 7 stocks bought by value investors in the Q1 2013 so that we can clone their actions and stocks bought.

1. Microsoft (MSFT)
Microsoft is currently owned by 55 gurus with some of the most notably being Donald Yacktman, David Einhorn, Mason Hawkins of Southeastern Asset Management, Ron Muhlenkamp etc. In Q1 2013, investors such as Donald Yacktman, Steven Romick (FPA Crescent Fund),  Thomas Russo added their stock holdings in Microsoft by 5% to 50%
Microsoft has been active in innovating new products, with the releases of Windows 8, Windows Phone 8 and Windows Surface tablet. Investors see Microsoft as having a dominant global franchise, an opportunity to increase its earnings in the emerging markets. The stock is selling at a low multiple of its cash flow and low multiple of earnings. Since the gurus bought it, the stock has been up 5%

2. Oracle (ORCL)
Orcale is a provider of enterprise software and a provider of computer hardware products and services. Its software, hardware systems, and services businesses develop, manufacture, market, host and support database and middleware software, applications software, and hardware systems, with the latter consisting mainly of computer server and storage products. Oracle makes hardware and software for the cloud and data centers, with 100 of the Fortune 100 as their clients. Oracle is currently owned by 34 gurus such as Seth Klarman, Lou Simpson (an investor that Warren Buffett trusts), Tom Russo, Ruane Cuniff etc. In Q1 2013, Glenn Greenberg (Brave Warrior Advisors), Lou Simpson, Thomas Gayner (Markel Asset Management) bought the stock.  Oracle’s balance sheet contains approximately $37 billion in cash, with $19 billion in long-term liabilities and debt. The company has also been generating higher annual free cash flow for a solid decade. 

3. Western Union (WU)
The Company is engaged in global money transfer and payment services, providing people with fast, reliable and convenient ways to send money around the world. Its services are available through a network of over 410,000 agent locations in more than 200 countries and territories. Western Union is owned by value investors such as John Rogers (Ariel Appreciation), Donald Yacktman etc. In Q1 2013, investors increased their holdings of Western Union between 15% to 120%. Western Union is deemed to be a cheap stock by investors where it is currently traded at about 6 times EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Depreciation and Amortization).

4. Coca Cola (KO)
Coca Cola owns and markets four of the world's top five nonalcoholic sparkling beverage brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. Though not considered a fast grower, the company gained 91% over the past 10 years, the maker of the globally beloved beverage had consistent long-term performance, pricing power and ever-increasing global consumption rates. Coca Cola is owned by 28 gurus with the most famous of them being Warren Buffett. Beside Warren Buffett, Joel Greenblatt (author of “You can be a stock genius”), Donald Yacktman, Ken Fisher, David Winters of Wintergreen Fund, Bill Gates, Jeremy Grantham also owned the stock. In 1Q 2013, Donald Yacktman, Robert Zagunia of Jensen Funds, Thomas Russo all bought the stock. Since their purchase, Coca Cola is up 10%. 

To know the rest of the stocks which the gurus are buying, please click here

Friday, April 19, 2013

What Warren Buffett Can Teach Us About Position Sizing


Investing successfully requires an investor to make many decisions. The first and foremost decision is the amount of capital available for investing, the type of asset (e.g. mutual funds, index funds (link to index fund article, stocks, gold etc.) to invest in and construct an investment portfolio. Regardless whether allocators select investment managers or individual securities, optimal position sizing is paramount to portfolio success. Small allocations to prescient investments minimize their impact while large allocations to poorly performing investments leads to underperformance

Some investors use a simplified model to construct their portfolio where an equal weight allocation is given to all investments not taking into account uncertainty regarding which investments will perform best. The portfolio is then rebalanced on a regular basis to maintain the equal-weight allocation. This equal weighted strategy benefits from simplicity and it prevents the portfolio from being over-allocated to one particular stock. However, the drawback of this strategy includes underweighting exceptional investments and overweighting marginal ideas.

An alternative strategy is to allocate large amount of capitals to the ideas with the most potential upside. This strategy suggests investors should invest proportionally according to their return expectations. Portfolio constructed using this strategy will tend to be concentrated with most of the portfolio being invested in a few high conviction stocks. The advantage of this methodology is matching prospective return to investment size. Many famed value investors such as Bruce Berkowitz, Donald Yacktman, Mohnish Pabrai and Warren Buffett runs concentrated portfolio where they take up huge position in their high conviction stock picks. One method that they could use to determine the position sizing is using the Kelly Criterion. Mohnish Pabrai in his book, The Dhandho Investor (amazon link), explain exclusively on how Kelly Formula can be used for portfolio allocation and how investors can benefit from using it.

What is Kelly Criterion?
The Kelly Growth Criterion is a simple formula that determines mathematically optimal allocations to maximize long-term portfolio performance given each investment’s probability of success (“edge”) compared to the amount gained or lost (“odds”). This mathematical formula was developed by John Larry Kelly Jr 50 years ago while working at the AT&T Bell Laboratories. The formula assumes a bimodal outcome of success (“base case”) or failure (“stress case”) over a single time period:
           


Since the formula was developed, it has been used by bettors and investors to beat the market.
How to compute the amount to invest/bet on a stock?
Let’s assume somebody offers you the following odds on a $1 bet and your bankroll is $10,000.

 80% chance of winning $21
10% chance of winning $7.5
10% chance of losing it all

According to Kelly Criterion, the edge is equal to 80% x 21 + 10% x 7.5 + 10% x -1( because we have lost our money)=16.8+0.75-0.1=17.45

To continue to read the article, click here
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Business